User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20130623083257/@comment-9435571-20130624235434

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20130623083257
Revision as of 00:19, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I recreated the separate article on Kaveetch and Pureblood Sontaran, but I don't see why you deleted the following article from Kaveetch:

"During either the 25th or 26th century, after the destruction of Sontar by the Rutans, the Sontaran clones encountered a lost Sontaran colony established before the Sontaran-Rutan war. They were called Pureblood Sontarans and eventually joined forces with their clone brethren. (COMIC: Pureblood)"

I can concede that the Purebloods might not be Kaveetch by that point, but since they are descendants of a lost colony established before the Rutan-Sontaran War, they clearly are descendants of the Kaveetch, even if the name "Pureblood" is not spoken in "The Last Sontarans" nor "Kaveetch" in "Pureblood". The Kaveetch also called themselves Sontarans so there is no contradiction there. I think the paragraph is very much relevant, as it directs the reader to a later surviving group of non-clone Sontarans.