Inclusion debates/Random stories in the Not-DWU material category

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates
Revision as of 04:36, 4 May 2023 by SOTO (talk | contribs) (User intended to link to categories, not add to them.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think we need to readdress numerous stories in Category:Non-DWU material and Category:Non-DWU stories.

Take Global Conspiracy, for instance. It's not a parody, just tongue-in-cheek. A lot of the "parodies" are like this.

Others are claimed to be advertisements - but at least one is explicitly stated on its page to be a story, NOT an advert, and to have all the licenses!

So, here's my proposal:

One by one, we examine the invalid stories that have NOT already been discussed and deemed invalid (as the FP debate is ongoing, we're excluding that, too). This means all those little five-minute stories are readdressed, like The BAFTAs, the NTA 2011 sketch, etc.. Some will certainly be placed right back in the invalid bin - but how many of us have watched all of these stories, or read them, etc.?