Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Wild Blue Yonder

You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which Wild Blue Yonder doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 

• Newton merely added a new definition to the existing word gravity, which already meant tending towards the centre of the Earth, so why does the episode treat it as if he made it up for the "Mavity" gag?

The word did exist before Newton but Newton greatly changed the definition of word, however, if he invented a new word for his theory instead of a pre-existing one than perhaps that word would be associated with gravity from then on and the actual pre-existing word of gravity falls into obscurity. It might not be super relevant but I feel like it's worth noting that the whole Newton bit can be seen as somewhat inaccurate, for example, there's no proof that an apple fell on Newton's head.

• The Doctor can tell when time changes as we’ve seen before, but he seems surprised to hearing Donna use the word mavity for the first time.

Perhaps this change was so tiny or unimportant that the Doctor couldn't tell that time changed this time.