Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/State of Decay

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which State of Decay doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 
  • The Doctor says the Tower decor is rococo when actually it's late Saxon/early Romanesque.
It's technically not quite either style, depending on whether development in the appropriate period is part of your definition. This was decorated in the future on an alien planet. The Doctor is being glib, as he often does. Rococo can also refer to any style that one considers to be unnecessarily elaborate, which the Doctor might well consider this to be.
  • In the cliffhanger to part one there are hundreds if not thousands of bats - who seem to conveniently disappear before the reprise in episode 2.
Some bats can move quite quickly, and these may well have simply flown out of shot.