Forum:Move protecting all TV story pages
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Would there be any issue for anyone if we move protected all the TV story pages up to Series 6? As there was a recent spate of a few moves of story pages, and I was just thinking none of the stories broadcast thus far actually need to be able to be moved and the story names are tied to various templates and such like. --Tangerineduel / talk 12:42, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Nope, I don't see anything wrong with this. Good plan.----Skittles the hog--Talk 15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Harmless change, if extremely boring to execute manually. Bot in process of doing it now.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">13:14:09 Sat 11 Jun 2011- Okay, this is done for all shows produced by the BBC. I didn't do K9, however, because I'm not sure that all of them have been properly named. The majority are probably fine, but one of two might still need to be disambiguated with (TV story). I'm not sure. It's unlikely we're going to experience much vandalism on K9 pages, anyway.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">17:54:01 Sat 11 Jun 2011
- Okay, this is done for all shows produced by the BBC. I didn't do K9, however, because I'm not sure that all of them have been properly named. The majority are probably fine, but one of two might still need to be disambiguated with (TV story). I'm not sure. It's unlikely we're going to experience much vandalism on K9 pages, anyway.
So are all the Doctor Who story articles protected starting from 1960s episodes? And are they Semi or Fully protected? --User:Doctorpenguin 
18:12, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
No, they're move protected. This means that only Admins can rename them.----Skittles the hog--Talk 18:20, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
