Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Awakening

You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which The Awakening doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 

• As Tegan notes, the Doctor seems to forget the reason that they went to the town in the first place.

Quite a lot happens to distract him.

• Why did the Malus not finish the job it was sent to do back during the real civil war? Why did it become dormant if it had the power to heighten aggressive behaviour and perpetuate the conflict?

Its sentience is in some doubt. Possibly its Hakolian masters / controllers suffered a decline of fortunes, and lost interest in their reconnaisance probes. The Malus just seems to be running "on automatic", taking advantage of aggressive circumstances (real wars or war games) to build up its power reserves, and blowing itself up when it is exposed, vulnerable, and at risk of capture.

• The entrance to the underground passageway in the church, operates by simply pressing the face of the Malus down. Surely not the best method of concealment for a secret door in the form of a floor slab? Anyone might step on it!
• The production team did not research the English Civil War very thoroughly. The Roundheads and Cavaliers were Victorian romanticisms perpetuatd in the 19th Century, and the terms were used as insults between the two sides!

Alternatively, the re-enactors got it wrong, though since Ben Wolsey is supposed to be an expert on the period, he ought to have set them right (but then again, Sir George Hutchinson is calling all the shots).