Forum:Is in-character linking narration canonical?

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 21:43, 18 August 2011 by CzechOut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> So yanno how BBC Video used to release incomplete s...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
IndexPanopticon → Is in-character linking narration canonical?
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

So yanno how BBC Video used to release incomplete serials with linking narration to cover the lost episodes? Sometimes, that used an actor who wasn't in character providing the narration, as with Tom Baker on Shada. But The Crusade release has William Russell fully in character as Ian Chesterton. They even give him a lower third which reads, "Ian Chesterton". So is that a valid image of Ian? And if so, doesn't it counter the Death of the Doctor notion that Ian never aged? And to the extent that there are other in-character linking narrations, do we take them seriously?
czechout<staff />    <span style="">21:43:52 Thu 18 Aug 2011