Forum:The Master

Index → Panopticon → The Master

Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Shouldn't we put The Master's incarnations on seperate pages instead of all on one page? The Master Chief-117 23:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

No. Unlike the Doctor where it's all very clear cut who/which one he is, with the Master it's a little more vague. Therefore easier to understand in one line in the single article. --Tangerineduel 14:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Can you explain how it's vague? Please? Just, so I understand. The Master Chief-117 01:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

There was a Master during the Third Doctor's era, which could have been basically any regeneration from 1-12. Then there was a Master in The Deadly Assassin, which was probably the 13th. Then he took over Tremas, which could be considered a continuation of his 13 regeneration or a whole new cycle. Then in the Doctor Who: The TV Movie he was killed by the Daleks, and turned into a snake-thingy, which could also be a continuation or a new cycle. Then he takes over a Human, which could also be a new cycle or a continuation. Then he's killed and brought back by the Time Lords for the Last Great Time War, which is definitely a new cycle. Then, at some point he goes to the far future, which in turn could be any regeneration from 1-12 (who knows how many times he was killed between being brought back and meeting the Doctor in Utopia?).

The Master's life isn't as well documented as the Doctors, so trying to split it up would be rather difficult. -<Azes13 03:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)>-