Howling:Rex is Immortal
So, does anyone have any guesses as to how Rex gained Jack's immortality? A blood transfusion can't be enough to turn Rex into a fixed point in space and time. As Jack said in The Gathering, there is nothing special about his blood in and of itsself. Since Gwen was wondering why the Blessing had allowed Esther to die right before Rex was shot, the Blessing must be involved somehow. Either it was thanking Rex for giving it mortal blood, or it assumed that Rex was supposed to be immortal since he had Jack's blood.Icecreamdif 17:38, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
I think it's supposed to be the latter, since everything it did was based on blood. They probably won't ever make it more explicit than that, but it's always possible that in a new series of Torchwood novels or series 5 of the show, Rex will ask Jack what happened and Jack will give him some kind of half-comprehensible technobabble explanation. --173.228.85.35 20:52, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
What if Rex is actually Face Of Boe? They have never really said that Jack is Face of Boe more than that hint on Doctor Who and on interwievs with actors and cast. (sorry but i dont know how to add my signature) mattias.nilsson86
- To add your signature, type the tilde key ("~") four times in a row. Usually people put two hyphens ("-") right before the tildes, but it's not required.
- Or, more simply, click the "More" button in the toolbar near the top of the page, then click "Signature" in the extra toolbar that appears.
- Anyway, I suppose it's not impossible that Rex is the Face of Boe, but there's even less evidence for him than for Jack, so… why? --173.228.85.35 23:56, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
The only real evidence we have for Jack being the Face of Boe is the fact that that used to be his nickname, so there is really no reason to believe that Rex is Boe.Icecreamdif 04:50, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
- To catalogue all the evidence:
- Boe is the oldest living lifeform in the universe (or in his galaxy, I forget which); no humanoid but Jack could live that long. Fits Rex as well as Jack.
- Jack's childhood nickname was "The Face of Boe", because he was a model from the Boeshane Peninsula. Doesn't fit Rex.
- Boe seemed to know the Doctor before the Doctor knew him. Doesn't fit Rex, but that could always change.
- Off-camera, RTD hinted that Jack is Boe, but wouldn't confirm it; Julie Gardner insisted he was, and tried to get RTD to confirm it, but RTD played coy. Doesn't fit Rex, but could just mean that at that point RTD was thinking of making Jack Boe, and he could have since changed his mind.
- As I said, it's not impossible, but there's even less evidence for him than for Jack—basically, the immortality is it. --173.228.85.35 06:09, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Yea, Jack is probably Face of Boe. But it wouldnt suprise me if RTD and Moffat would "troll" us with changing it to Rex :P Mattias.nilsson86 21:11, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
The Face of Boe will probably never be mentioned again. If he was, then it would be in Doctor Who rather than Torchwood, and I doubt that Rex will ever appear in Doctor Who, unless they have the entire team appear like they did in The Stolen Earth, and then things would still be centered much more around Jack than around Rex. The Face of Boe is either Jack or the last of the Boekind, but there is no reason to believe that he is Rex.Icecreamdif 21:37, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Gwen, Jack & Rex: "What?" "What?" "What?" -- Very 10th Doctor. --89.240.251.76 03:22, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
if rex has been turned into an immortal using jacks blood that presumably means the same thing can thing thoeritically happen to anyone. I'm guessing the blessing either mistook rex for jack becuase of having his blood or it was a gift like gwen mentioned. just becuase rex is immortal doesn't necessarily mean he'll be sticking around. I can imagine that two characters with the sae abilities will step on each others toes abit so I wouldn't be surprised to see either rex or jack leave and become recurring characters. more so jack I think so we can see how being immortal affects rex plus he'll just run arund exploring the universe between appearances and just generally making him a bit more ysterious.
They're not going to demote Jack to being a recurring character. Jack has always been the main character of the show, and without Jack there is no Torchwood. It would be like having Doctor Who focus on Amy and Rory with the Doctor acting as a recurring character.Icecreamdif 19:19, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
"without Jack there is no Torchwood": Agreed. In fact, without Jack and Gwen, there wouldn't be. Jack on his own would just be Jack, not Torchwood.
As pointed out, the cause of what happened to Rex isn't going to be as simple as getting a transfusion of Jack's blood. That would be far too dangerous for the future of the show (and the Whoniverse as a whole): Character dying? Give him/her a shot of Jack's blood. You'd end up repeating the Miracle but with the improvement that people would heal. It has to be because Rex had Jack's blood in him at the time the Blessing reset its "template" for humanity. Possibly also the fact that the two of them were at opposite ends of the Blessing and performing the same role -- feeding Jack's blood into it. It needn't be either that it "mistook" Rex for Jack or a "gift"; it could simply be that the Blessing, by its nature, has to work symmetrically. Of course, that raises the question of what would have happened if the supply of Jack's blood in Buenos Aires had been in plastic bags, not in Rex. That didn't happen, so we don't know.
I've no inside information about future plans for Rex but a possibility is that, assuming the next series is about the Families' "Plan B" and bearing in mind how deeply the CIA seems to have been penetrated by their agents, he might become Torchwood's "man in Langley" or, at least, their man with contacts inside the CIA. Logically, there ought now to be a major mole hunt going on in the CIA, with who knows what results -- apart from the paranoia that mole hunts always produce. The Families ought to sit back and wait a while to let that process reach the point of maximum suspicion and minimum results, then make their next move. --78.146.182.150 21:39, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
