Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Christmas Invasion

Theory page
You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which The Christmas Invasion doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 
  • It is left unexplained why Britain's space program has apparently reverted to celebrating unmanned probes arriving at Mars when The Ambassadors of Death established that by this time Britain had already sent manned missions to Mars.
There is actually a real-world example of such reversion occurring. America's NASA program sent manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 70s, yet by the 2000s had reverted to again sending unmanned probes to the moon. The secrecy involving restricting public knowledge of alien life might also imply that those earlier missions may not have been public knowledge.
In The Ambassadors of Death the Time Lords were still around. The Doctor could have visited a parallel universe, as it was still possible to do so at that time.
Time is constantly in flux.
  • After indicating to Rose how important Harriet Jones becomes to Britain and planet Earth in World War Three, the Doctor proceeds to sabotage her career. What about his many spiels about his being forbidden to change history?
Some events can be changed, as established in The Fires of Pompeii. This must be one of them. In any case, Harriet Jones was to be vital to the world in The Stolen Earth. In that story, her death was not witnessed by the audience or any of the characters. It remains possible then, that she survived and did eventually serve the two more terms and usher in Britain's Golden Age, as predicted by the Ninth Doctor. Alternatively, it was the Doctor deposing Harriet that led to the Master to be elected in her place.
  • How is the scarf that the Fourth Doctor wore in the TARDIS wardrobe? The Fifth Doctor took it apart in his first episode, and the Ninth Doctor was noted on Clive Finch's website to throw a scarf into a skip.
It is possible that the Fourth Doctor had multiple scarves, just the Tenth seemed to have multiple blue suits.
The Doctor could have acquired a new scarf, or simply re-sewn the old one if he became nostalgic.
After dumping it in the skip he may have changed his mind and got it back.
Re-watch DW: Castrovalva. The Fourth Doctor was seen to wear at least two distinct scarfs. The Fifth Doctor unravels the Fourth Doctor's burgundy scarf. The one seen in the wardrobe here is multi-colour.If the Robot Santas could plant the remote controlled Killer Christmas tree into the Tyler's flat why couldn't they simply abduct the Doctor while they were there or if they plnted the tree by means of teleportation why not simply teleport themselves inside?
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.