Forum:Validity: AU games

Index → Inclusion debates → Validity: AU games

Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Just shining a light on these old online games which, as I understand it, were only ever invalid because they twisted the events of certain episodes (I believe these are all of them), The Last Dalek ^[+]Loading...["The Last Dalek (video game)","The Last Dalek"], Slitheen Surfer ^[+]Loading...["Slitheen Surfer (video game)"], K9: Deja Who ^[+]Loading...["K9: Deja Who (video game)"] and Daleks v Cybermen ^[+]Loading...["Daleks v Cybermen (video game)"]. MrThermomanPreacher ☎ 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Also including the Cybusman campaign of Cyber Assault ^[+]Loading...["Cyber Assault (video game)"]. --MrThermomanPreacher ☎ 15:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

I'm unsure on validating the stories - do they actually pass rule 4 (intent), whether as alternate timelines, parallel universes, or simply alternate accounts of events? I'm not too sure that "the Doctor dies during the events of Dalek" is intended to be a valid alternate series of events, but I'm not certain either way. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)