User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-1789834-20200606134601
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
In this extremely confusing debate where it seems everyone is saying the same things yet also saying completely different things (get the Celestial Intervention Agency to unravel that paradox), I'll just give my takes on your top three points and tell me whether I've understood correctly:
- An extract is an extract. It always will be just an extract. It is not a story, it is an extract.
- If someone in authority claimed it contained enough of a storyline to be a fully fledged, valid story, then we could argue its validity. As far as I'm aware, no-one has claimed validity on the DW team, therefore it isn't and remains an extract.
- Emily Cook's tweet is clear. I don't know how anyone can misinterpret it. She's talking about it being a part of a previous conversation with fans that he probably thought was of interest to them. When Harness tweeted about this Monk fact, it had ZERO correlation to the Lockdown! event.
- Cook is a vital member of the Lockdown! team, but I would suggest those such as RTD, Moff and Chibbs are much more influencial. Cook has done a lot of brilliant work for the DWU but her influence isn't that strong. Cook is one part of a well-oiled team. If Moff turns around and says something isn't deemed 'valid', that's it haha.
Just my opinion. I'm confused because I thought Disoriented agreed with me on the first point... again, this conversation is people agreeing and disagreeing on exactly the same points.
