User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200606191327
More actions
I largely agree with Scrooge's comment, but have a few points further to add.
- The time at which the user asked Cook on Twitter was a time at which DiSoRiEnTeD1 was both insisting that B was not part of Lockdown! and Scrooge had already made the distinction between B and C clear. This fact cannot be ignored in our analysis of the exchange.
- To claim that there was no official release is to question beg a resolution of Thread:273268 at this point. It's obviously untenable and should be discarded after a second's thought.
- If we apply the principle of charity to both Harness and Cook's comments, we're left with mine and Scrooge's interpretations. As otherwise we're concluding that Harness is lying about the novelization and Cook is wildly confused about how the English language works.
- And in the issue of transparency, Harness does not explicitly say that he was making a Target novelisation. But the only other type of novelization for Doctor Who near this time period was a Doctor Who photo novelisation, an idea even more ridiculous, given the details of that story.