68,673
edits
Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more (view source)
Revision as of 09:32, 7 November 2012
, 7 November 2012→Summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
So, even if it's decided that the War Chief isn't the Master, tat "myth" and "there is evidence stating they aren't" should be removed. After all, one source(especially a dream-sequence in a continuity-error-full book) can not make the other invalid. Perhaps a change to something along the lines that he ''may'' be?[[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 08:29, November 7, 2012 (UTC) | So, even if it's decided that the War Chief isn't the Master, tat "myth" and "there is evidence stating they aren't" should be removed. After all, one source(especially a dream-sequence in a continuity-error-full book) can not make the other invalid. Perhaps a change to something along the lines that he ''may'' be?[[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 08:29, November 7, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:You don't need to quote me as "someone" that said something "earlier" you ''can'' just refer to my discussion point '''above'''. This is a discussion, not an online message board. | |||
:I don't fully understand your point because you're making it ''really'' hard to understand. | |||
:As I have said above, please stop repeating information that's on the Magnus talk page, the dense text copied text is not helping your argument. | |||
:From the quote you've provided, Russell hasn't said that, he said Gray intended it and Russell cocked up it in the editing process. But what actually made it to print, that is what we use. Not what might have been, we also don't use deleted scenes to write in-universe articles either. But this isn't even that, it's something that was intended, but didn't make into print. | |||
:As to the Deca question. That discussion; [[Forum:How to handle the Deca]] has been waiting on you to continue to interact with the discussion process. | |||
:"Major" continuity errors don't invalidate a work. So, to answer your question yes. The information in a "continuity laden book" beats real world information. ''Divided Loyalties'' is not the only example of a continuity heavy book that contradicts what came before it. | |||
:Without any side references, without any points that other people have made, without any quotes to other things, please state, preferable in short bullet pointed sentences what you're actually arguing. | |||
:As at the moment all I have to go on is your initial statement at the top of the Magnus talk page and the citation of Russell's quote. I can't fathom ''why'' you're reeling off streams of novelisation info here, repeating what's on the Magnus talk page. Editors interested in this discussion will go to that talk page to see the information you're written there, or quite likely have already read the information there and followed the discussion here. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 09:32, November 7, 2012 (UTC) | |||
