Howling:What's the connection between the Big Bads?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:What's the connection between the Big Bads? (view source)
Revision as of 08:44, 29 May 2013
, 29 May 2013no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
@[[User:Badwolff|Badwolff]], if the seires ended on a cliffhanger, then '''technically''' there were no two-parters ''in'' the series. Call it semantics, call it a play on words, call it misleading even, but it was technically accurate. 06:24, May 29, 2013 (UTC) | @[[User:Badwolff|Badwolff]], if the seires ended on a cliffhanger, then '''technically''' there were no two-parters ''in'' the series. Call it semantics, call it a play on words, call it misleading even, but it was technically accurate. 06:24, May 29, 2013 (UTC) | ||
That seems to have been [[User:Whosethebestwho|Whosethebestwho]]. | |||
Even if that's the case, Moffat was ostensibly talking about the 50th Anniversary episode. The technicality might save his '''earlier''' statement, "No 2-parters in Series 7" from being an outright lie but it can't save his reported comments about the 50th. Of course, without getting his exact words, we can't tell if there's some other technicality that makes '''them''' true on the surface (but only on the surface). Anyway, it's not defamatory to say, "Moffat lies," when Moffat has said exactly that himself. In the end, the only way we're going to know the truth about the 50th is to see the thing. In November. After waiting 6 months. Unless someone happens to have a time machine handy. (I was 89 earlier.) --[[Special:Contributions/78.146.187.63|78.146.187.63]]<sup>[[User talk:78.146.187.63#top|talk to me]]</sup> 08:44, May 29, 2013 (UTC) | |||
