Trusted
25,401
edits
Theory talk:Timey-wimey detector: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Making the timelines more accessible
SarahJaneFan (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
That’s just how I’ve gotten used to it I suppose. It’s entirely possible to discuss things further and come up with new ideas. [[User:SarahJaneFan|SarahJaneFan]] [[User talk:SarahJaneFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:42, May 13, 2020 (UTC) | That’s just how I’ve gotten used to it I suppose. It’s entirely possible to discuss things further and come up with new ideas. [[User:SarahJaneFan|SarahJaneFan]] [[User talk:SarahJaneFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:42, May 13, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: The italicisation is everywhere I look. Just take a look at [[Theory:Timeline - Seventh Doctor#Battling the Elder Gods]] and you'll see what I mean. | |||
: I noticed you tried out the titling thing on the Second Doctor timeline, and I think it looked good. Although I personally would have had separate titles for == Ben & Polly == and for == Ben, Polly, & Jamie ==. I also noticed BCM reverted them and still hasn't come here to discuss, which I hope he does soon. | |||
: I see your point with prologues/epilogues, and I'll concede that one. Your point on Flashbacks and relevant mentions - I definitely agree. One thing I didn't mention eariler: stories which are divided into parts should state as much and be presented in the otherwise normal format. E.g. ''Old Boys'', which appears three times on the [[Theory:Timeline - Sixth Doctor|Sixth Doctor's timeline]], all in "flashback" form. It seems to be split into three parts, each with a different TARDIS crew. Although I haven't read it yet. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:09, May 20, 2020 (UTC) | |||
