Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,216
edits
User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
As to the issue itself, the reason I petitioned SOTO instead of you is that I believed you were simply offline at the moment (hence not having rectified the situation yet) and that T:SPOIL issues must be taken care of with all possible haste. In any case, I would urge you to post a reply saying you ''have'' performed the edit, if a similar situation presents itself some other time. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:56, July 28, 2020 (UTC) | As to the issue itself, the reason I petitioned SOTO instead of you is that I believed you were simply offline at the moment (hence not having rectified the situation yet) and that T:SPOIL issues must be taken care of with all possible haste. In any case, I would urge you to post a reply saying you ''have'' performed the edit, if a similar situation presents itself some other time. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:56, July 28, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: The dictionary comment was avowed hyperbole, and I believe you understood it as such. "Cute", on the other hand — what — can you imagine a politician taken to task about whether a particular, notoriously useless policy decision by a predecessor was a good idea, trying to argue that it was well-intentioned (albeit useless) by calling it "cute", with a straight face? Seriously? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:04, July 28, 2020 (UTC) | |||
