Trusted
8,509
edits
Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→New Evidence re Lockdown stories
| Line 535: | Line 535: | ||
:::: Yes, they are presented as part of “The Lockdown Longsong” on the official lockdown website. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:49, November 4, 2020 (UTC) | :::: Yes, they are presented as part of “The Lockdown Longsong” on the official lockdown website. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:49, November 4, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Be that as it may, the [[T:SPOIL]] concerns have just evaporated from around another major piece of evidence, pointing in a very direction from the website. I'm talking, of course, about ''[[Adventures in Lockdown]]'', which freely mixes BBC website stories with novelisations of ''Lockdown!'' webcasts — ''and'' also throws in a prose version of [[WC]]: ''[[Message from the Doctor (webcast)|Message from the Doctor]]'' for good measure! I honestly can think of few stronger arguments for keeping it all on one page in ''some'' fashion. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:01, November 5, 2020 (UTC) | ::: Be that as it may, the [[T:SPOIL]] concerns have just evaporated from around another major piece of evidence, pointing in a very direction from the website. I'm talking, of course, about ''[[Adventures in Lockdown]]'', which freely mixes BBC website stories with novelisations of ''Lockdown!'' webcasts — ''and'' also throws in a prose version of [[WC]]: ''[[Message from the Doctor (webcast)|Message from the Doctor]]'' for good measure! I honestly can think of few stronger arguments for keeping it all on one page in ''some'' fashion. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:01, November 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::At this point this is just a continuation of [[Thread:273268]], which was closed due to length and no admin has given the go ahead for re-opening discussion. My suggestion is that we shelve the discussion for now (as we're potentially in violation of some policy or another by having this discussion), wait until we're back on the forums, and take the temperature of the admin team for reopening the discussion. While I hope given the distance from the original subject and time to cool off we might be more productive and not need 500 comments, the risk of making no real headway due to how inherently slapdash the whole affair has been is still a very real possibility. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:48, November 5, 2020 (UTC) | |||
