Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,218
edits
User talk:PoolsideJazz: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:To clarify, I believe Scrooge means rule ''4'', as he stated at [[Doctor Who: Lockdown!#Announcement on 'The Fan Gallery']]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:50, November 7, 2020 (UTC) | :To clarify, I believe Scrooge means rule ''4'', as he stated at [[Doctor Who: Lockdown!#Announcement on 'The Fan Gallery']]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:50, November 7, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::(Er… yes. Sorry about that. "Rule 5" indeed. Talk about a typo… At least there's no ''in''correct meaning you could have derived from that statement, it was just meaningless.) --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:54, November 7, 2020 (UTC) | ::(Er… yes. Sorry about that. "Rule 5" indeed. Talk about a typo… At least there's no ''in''correct meaning you could have derived from that statement, it was just meaningless.) --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:54, November 7, 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Re: Cosmic Masque == | |||
From the sound of it, we should indeed have pages about it as reference material if nothing else. I'm agnostic on the matter of stories published ''in'' it until there's more evidence. If that story was written by [[Paul Magrs]] (or otherwise licensed by all relevant copyright holders), ''and'' if ''Cosmic Masque'' was released commercially, then sure, I see no reason why that story wouldn't be valid. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:50, November 9, 2020 (UTC) | |||
