66
edits
Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Fan Gallery and their licensing
JDPManjoume (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
PoolsideJazz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 834: | Line 834: | ||
:: It might be an option to cover the other non-rule 2 failers as invalid but I would prefer if all ''The Fan Gallery'' stories are instead listed on the ''Lockdown!'' page with external links to the ''Lockdown!'' Wiki where they can be covered in full. [[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | :: It might be an option to cover the other non-rule 2 failers as invalid but I would prefer if all ''The Fan Gallery'' stories are instead listed on the ''Lockdown!'' page with external links to the ''Lockdown!'' Wiki where they can be covered in full. [[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::I don’t understand how anything I said could border on a personal attack? Regardless of your intention while creating your story, any contribution of yours to this discussion has the danger of having a conflict of interest towards your own story and all of your involvement / previous admin rulings could be picked apart. | |||
:::For example; it could be argued that you allowed clearly labeled fan fiction onto the site in the first place was because you planned to submit your own piece the following week. Then you intentionally sought out a licensable character and limited your in-universe references because you were aware that otherwise your story wouldn’t remain on the site permanently. | |||
:::While I’m not accusing you of doing this, it is what could be easily argued to call into question any involvement you have had in these discussions / rulings. [[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]] [[User talk:PoolsideJazz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
