Trusted
8,503
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity (view source)
Revision as of 22:22, 5 March 2023
, 5 March 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
I '''support''' the validity of the three stories. ''Legacy Kids'' can wait. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | I '''support''' the validity of the three stories. ''Legacy Kids'' can wait. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
I fully '''support''' its inclusion. As other have said legacy kids can wait for now[[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | I fully '''support''' its inclusion. As other have said legacy kids can wait for now[[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I think this is where my procedural qualms hit their limit. We have ''so much'' prior discussion on video games in the deleted forums that I'm not comfortable supporting any attempts to validate video games without looking at those discussions and seeing if/where they went wrong. I'm '''opposed''' (though I strongly suspect that I would support when I saw those older threads). With that said, I fully expect to be the only person to feel this way. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
