231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-24894325-20161220232510: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-24894325-20161220232510 (edit)
Revision as of 22:37, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think, in the end, we actually agree. You are saying that the titles do not always make sense on their own. I am saying that whatever sense they make, the additional meanings brought by the prefix are not worth fighting for. | I think, in the end, we actually agree. You are saying that the titles do not always make sense on their own. I am saying that whatever sense they make, the additional meanings brought by the prefix are not worth fighting for. | ||
So, yes, I agree that all UNIT stories and boxsets (old and new) should be named without the prefix "UNIT". Then the rules described in that [[Thread:193754|old thread]] would finally explain the names of '''all''' Big Finish audio stories on this wiki. | So, yes, I agree that all UNIT stories and boxsets (old and new) should be named without the prefix "UNIT". Then the rules described in that [[Thread:193754|old thread]] would finally explain the names of '''all''' Big Finish audio stories on this wiki. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161123164500-25117610/20161220232510-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
