Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
118,870
edits
Forum:Inclusion debates: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Temporarily removing image.
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 2017 source edit |
(Temporarily removing image.) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== When policy changes === | === When policy changes === | ||
{{first pic|Six and Valeyard promo.jpg|"A-ha! So there ''is'' an exception!"}} | <!--{{first pic|Six and Valeyard promo.jpg|"A-ha! So there ''is'' an exception!"}}--> | ||
Sometimes, properly accounting for a new and peculiar case which isn't properly accounted for by current policy, means that an inclusion debate will end up doing double-duty, and also being a "policy changer" in the vein of a [[Forum:The Panopticon]] thread. This is fine and expected. However, if you know ''from the start'' that what you are proposing is an alteration to policy rather than a specific debate about how to cover something in particular, it would be better to open the thread in the Panopticon to start with. | Sometimes, properly accounting for a new and peculiar case which isn't properly accounted for by current policy, means that an inclusion debate will end up doing double-duty, and also being a "policy changer" in the vein of a [[Forum:The Panopticon]] thread. This is fine and expected. However, if you know ''from the start'' that what you are proposing is an alteration to policy rather than a specific debate about how to cover something in particular, it would be better to open the thread in the Panopticon to start with. | ||
