Forum:Relaxing our fan works policy (within reason): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 136: Line 136:


::::Nobody's talking about ''covering'' fan works, only creating pages for incredibly notable ones. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]]  14:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
::::Nobody's talking about ''covering'' fan works, only creating pages for incredibly notable ones. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]]  14:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Oh hey 81.108, good to see you again! We've missed you, or, at least, I have, I'm sure everyone else has too. Hmm. I think this is a reasonable point at first glance. Our internal wiki deliberations can often seem arcane to people who haven't gone through the rough and tumble socialization of editing for a while. I've seen it compared to jurisprudence and legal precedent on twitter, which is what I've taken to calling it, but just recently I saw someone talking about Talmudic interpretation that made me think of these forums.
Has anyone ever objected to our already existing pages for [[Campaign (unreleased novel)]] or other unreleased novels? How about for various reference works? These seem to be the most analogous things. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Trusted
8,501

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.