68,671
edits
Forum:Italics or Quotation marks?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Discussion renewed
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
:::::#What to do about televised non-fictional episodes. I can deal with all fictional televised stories being italicized, but what if it's an episode of ''[[Doctor Who Confidential]]''? Should the rule be, "If it's televised, it's italicized (unless it's a single ep of Hartnell)", or "If it's televised ''and fictional'', it's italicized (save Hartnell eps)"? You may not think this a big deal (and it's not ''that'' big a deal, yet), but I regularly cite ''Confidential'' eps, and have recently put in place the tools to begin making pages for the eps. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 18:26, June 25, 2010 (UTC) | :::::#What to do about televised non-fictional episodes. I can deal with all fictional televised stories being italicized, but what if it's an episode of ''[[Doctor Who Confidential]]''? Should the rule be, "If it's televised, it's italicized (unless it's a single ep of Hartnell)", or "If it's televised ''and fictional'', it's italicized (save Hartnell eps)"? You may not think this a big deal (and it's not ''that'' big a deal, yet), but I regularly cite ''Confidential'' eps, and have recently put in place the tools to begin making pages for the eps. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 18:26, June 25, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Sorry to jump in late on this discussion. I have to say, though, that I don't believe any of this to be necessary. The consistent visual style of the citations is far more pleasing to my eyes and brain than italicising some things and quoting others. We give episodes, short stories, and other works the same canonical weight when citing things to them, and I don't see why our citation style should change from one format to the next. Doing so looks subtly wrong to my eyes and causes an extra twinge of cognitive dissonance when reading an article. I do appreciate what CzechOut is saying about the standards of written English (wonderful language, all of them!) and were we writing about the stories in a plain sentence, such as a mention in the body of a real-world article (Joe Actor played Character in ''Episode,'' Bob Author was the writer of "Short Story," etc.,) the rules would prevail. In the case of our citations, however, we are not doing so. Instead we are following an original style guide which this wiki's community came up with at the start where none existed in standard English, and which has made this wiki a pleasantly consistent thing to read, build, and use. [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 01:05, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | :Sorry to jump in late on this discussion. I have to say, though, that I don't believe any of this to be necessary. The consistent visual style of the citations is far more pleasing to my eyes and brain than italicising some things and quoting others. We give episodes, short stories, and other works the same canonical weight when citing things to them, and I don't see why our citation style should change from one format to the next. Doing so looks subtly wrong to my eyes and causes an extra twinge of cognitive dissonance when reading an article. I do appreciate what CzechOut is saying about the standards of written English (wonderful language, all of them!) and were we writing about the stories in a plain sentence, such as a mention in the body of a real-world article (Joe Actor played Character in ''Episode,'' Bob Author was the writer of "Short Story," etc.,) the rules would prevail. In the case of our citations, however, we are not doing so. Instead we are following an original style guide which this wiki's community came up with at the start where none existed in standard English, and which has made this wiki a pleasantly consistent thing to read, build, and use. [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 01:05, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Rob T Firefly pretty much sums up what I've always felt (my suggestions above are...what I often do, throwing ideas into the water to see if they sink or swim, they're often spur of the moment). | |||
::As to CzechOut's question of non-fiction things being cited, that is perhaps a different discussion. | |||
::For now, I'm inclined to stick with what we're using at the moment, I have maintained that I understand CzechOut's points about this, but there is something to having a consistent visual style to the layout of a wiki that over-rules it somewhat. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 06:40, June 28, 2010 (UTC) | |||
