Talk:Stone Dalek: Difference between revisions

Talk:Stone Dalek (edit)

318 bytes added , 28 June 2010

m

28

edits

Revision as of 21:21, 27 June 2010 (edit) 92.232.57.66 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:57, 28 June 2010 (edit) (undo) Sorceror Nobody (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Dalek Rank/Type) Newer edit →
Line 31:		Line 31:

	It's possible this is the Eternal Dalek which would give meaning to it's name [[User:Oni Dark Link\|<font color="#66FFFF">Oni</font>]] [[Special:Editcount/Oni Dark Link\|<font color="#7F007F">Dark </font>]] [[User:Oni Dark Link/Curiosity Trading one or two?\|<font color="#007A00">Link</font>]] 18:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC)		It's possible this is the Eternal Dalek which would give meaning to it's name [[User:Oni Dark Link\|<font color="#66FFFF">Oni</font>]] [[Special:Editcount/Oni Dark Link\|<font color="#7F007F">Dark </font>]] [[User:Oni Dark Link/Curiosity Trading one or two?\|<font color="#007A00">Link</font>]] 18:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
			:I thought that too. When the Pandorica partially regenerated it, I was half expecting the stone to give way to yellow... um... well, let's be honest, the new Daleks are blatantly ''plastic''. Anyway, sadly not... so the Eternal remains an enigma -- [[User:Sorceror Nobody\|Sorceror Nobody]] 15:57, June 28, 2010 (UTC)