68,766
edits
Template talk:DW/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::::::I'm in favour of removing the templates from use, but I think they can remain as a project that ''could'' likely be fixed in the future. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC) | ::::::I'm in favour of removing the templates from use, but I think they can remain as a project that ''could'' likely be fixed in the future. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I've been reading through the [[Template:DW/Text]] for this, which is where it all issues seem to stem from. The Text page is transcluded across all the other templates which seems to account for all the red-links. | |||
:::::::I'm still not convinced and am with Doug86 on this front, a sentence on the page such as ''"Acutally entering a disambiguated name into this template will not produce the desired results."''. I think we need to have story citation as straight forward as possible, and this is telling people ''not'' to include the full title of the article. | |||
:::::::As to how to resolve this, we either need to blanket much of the text page with "nowikis" to prevent redlinks or delete the page. | |||
:::::::However, several users have worked on this template so, maybe moving it out of the template space to somewhere else and then add "no wikis" to it, rather than deleting the page. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:10, July 28, 2010 (UTC) | |||
