33,205
edits
Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource (edit)
Revision as of 17:07, 29 March 2011
, 29 March 2011no edit summary
No edit summary |
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:::::We're not looking to removed the source, but to replace it. I'm all basically saying is we '''stop''' adding the source from Doctorwhospoilers, and try to replace what we have with a proper source. If not just use the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>.{{Unsigned|Mini-mitch}} | :::::We're not looking to removed the source, but to replace it. I'm all basically saying is we '''stop''' adding the source from Doctorwhospoilers, and try to replace what we have with a proper source. If not just use the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>.{{Unsigned|Mini-mitch}} | ||
I don't know who your we is. From what I can see '''community''' policy dictates their removal. Replace them if you wish, but don't leave them hanging around.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 17:03, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | ::::::I don't know who your we is. From what I can see '''community''' policy dictates their removal. Replace them if you wish, but don't leave them hanging around.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 17:03, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I'll remove the Doctorwhospoiler references from them all. Add the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> and then find sources. I can start today, but I might need tomorrow as well. I'll add the <nowiki>{{insuse}}</nowiki> template to the page during this time. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 17:07, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
