49,076
edits
Forum:UNIT aren't really companions: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Bigredrabbit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I understand what you're suggesting now and I totally get why Liz, Lethbridge-Stewart, Benton and Mike would be considered companions. Whilst I don't know if I still agree with this, I would disagree that many of the Tenth Doctor's so-called companions (i.e. [[Astrid Peth]], [[Tish Jones]], [[Francine Jones]], [[Clive Jones]], [[Leo Jones]], [[Sylvia Noble]], [[Wilfred Mott]], [[Jackson Lake]], [[Rosita Farisi]], [[Christina de Souza]] and [[Adelaide Brooke]] (especially those last four)). Although the UNIT people could well be considered companions, I still stick by my claim that the aforementioned Tenth Doctor companions are not. I think that this wiki should establish a definition of companion so that things like this can be prevented in future. [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] 07:42, August 8, 2011 (UTC) | I understand what you're suggesting now and I totally get why Liz, Lethbridge-Stewart, Benton and Mike would be considered companions. Whilst I don't know if I still agree with this, I would disagree that many of the Tenth Doctor's so-called companions (i.e. [[Astrid Peth]], [[Tish Jones]], [[Francine Jones]], [[Clive Jones]], [[Leo Jones]], [[Sylvia Noble]], [[Wilfred Mott]], [[Jackson Lake]], [[Rosita Farisi]], [[Christina de Souza]] and [[Adelaide Brooke]] (especially those last four)). Although the UNIT people could well be considered companions, I still stick by my claim that the aforementioned Tenth Doctor companions are not. I think that this wiki should establish a definition of companion so that things like this can be prevented in future. [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] 07:42, August 8, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Oh, yeah. That would stop the argument.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 11:17, August 8, 2011 (UTC) | |||
