Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Is in-character linking narration canonical?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Is in-character linking narration canonical? (edit)
Revision as of 02:47, 23 August 2011
, 23 August 2011no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
If BBC Wales says it's valid, then it's canon. That's a lot clearer than vague references to CURSE OF THE FATAL DEATH as a dream. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 22:44, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | If BBC Wales says it's valid, then it's canon. That's a lot clearer than vague references to CURSE OF THE FATAL DEATH as a dream. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 22:44, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Well, BBC Wales makes virtually no pronouncements on what they think of as a "valid" story. And the issue here is that there's an official BBC-made in-character "snippet" which directly challenges the BBC Wales-made episode of [[SJA]] on the issue of the [[21st century]] nature of [[Ian Chesterton]]. Sarah Jane tells us that Ian is unaged from his 1963/5 appearance, whereas this in-character linking narration shows us a man with white hair claiming to be Sir Ian Chesterton. And don't even get me started on the minefield that is the Fourth Doctor narration of ''The Power of the Daleks''. Thing is though we do need to at least ''consider'' how to deal with these oddities. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''02:47:05 Tue '''23 Aug 2011 </span> | |||
