Howling:Eye of Harmony in the Doctor's TARDIS: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:Eye of Harmony in the Doctor's TARDIS (view source)
Revision as of 07:54, 2 September 2011
, 2 September 2011no edit summary
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
If the eyes could work without being connected to the pime eye, then the Doctor wouldn't need to use rift energy after the Time War, would he. They robably had the eye in the TARDIS linked to the prime eye on Gallifrey back in ancient times, forgot about it over the years, got rid of the mini eye and started using an alternate power source, found the main eye in ''The Deadly Assassin'', reinstalled the minieyes in modern TARDISes, and linked them all to the newly rediscovered prime eye. THhe Doctor would have had plenty of time in between ''The Deadly Assassin'' and the TV movie to get a mini eye in his TARDIS.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 01:34, September 2, 2011 (UTC) | If the eyes could work without being connected to the pime eye, then the Doctor wouldn't need to use rift energy after the Time War, would he. They robably had the eye in the TARDIS linked to the prime eye on Gallifrey back in ancient times, forgot about it over the years, got rid of the mini eye and started using an alternate power source, found the main eye in ''The Deadly Assassin'', reinstalled the minieyes in modern TARDISes, and linked them all to the newly rediscovered prime eye. THhe Doctor would have had plenty of time in between ''The Deadly Assassin'' and the TV movie to get a mini eye in his TARDIS.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 01:34, September 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:"All TARDISes could not have had a direct link to the Eye when the Doctor's TARDIS was created," Well, RTD, his script editor, and a slew of EDA writers think it could have had a direct link, but maybe you know ''Doctor Who'' better than all of them. | |||
:Just because you can't imagine how something can be explained doesn't mean there's no possible explanation. Maybe someone else is more clever than you—or, more likely, someone else is just more obsessive than you and willing to waste more time thinking one up. I gave some possible explanations above, that people thought up decades ago in long geeky arguments (the Master couldn't use the link because there's not enough power—just like you can't toast marshmallows over your heating vents even though they're linked to a furnace; everybody knew about the power source for Gallifrey, but nobody knew that it was the fabled Eye of Harmony). You don't have to accept those as the canonical answer (the first one appears only in the EDAs, and the second has as far as I know never been used in-universe). But clearly they serve as an existence proof that an answer is possible. --[[Special:Contributions/173.228.85.35|173.228.85.35]] 07:54, September 2, 2011 (UTC) | |||
