Yes, I agree with AeD.
There is a very important group of editors we should all cherish: new editors just learning the ropes. They are more likely to start their inclusion debates based on the literal reading of the rules and examples given on T:VS than on studying the existing precedents and all the past inclusion debates.
The less admins would have to shut down good-faith attempts using unwritten common sense, the less frustrated these editors will be.
As for the bad-faith ones, we should simply ignore them in the rule-making because they will disregard whatever rules are on the books.