Information for "Howling:NOT the ninth doctor???"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Display title | Howling:NOT the ninth doctor??? |
Default sort key | NOT the ninth doctor??? |
Page length (in bytes) | 10,822 |
Namespace | Howling |
Page ID | 64963 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
Page creator | Himself3909 (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 01:00, 21 March 2011 |
Latest editor | CzechBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 04:39, 19 September 2012 |
Total number of edits | 23 |
Total number of distinct authors | 9 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Has anyone put forward the idea that the Doctor who steped out of the Tardis in "Rose", is really the FIRST Doctor, and not the "ninth"? Has anyone established that the Doctor we first saw in 1963 was really the "first"? Making 10 really #2, 11, #3 etc. Might explain River's ongoing joke / brush off, "Maybe when you're older..." – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Himself3909 (talk • contribs) . |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO