Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time: Difference between revisions

Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time (edit)

Revision as of 02:26, 10 July 2012

1,813 bytes added , 10 July 2012

no edit summary

Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator

85,404

edits

@@ Line 174: / Line 174: @@
 ::On the primary topic, you seem to have misunderstood. "Don't go beyond what is actually stated in the source" is ''exactly'' what I was trying to convey. So if ''The Gallifrey chronicles'' mentions three incarnations of the Ninth Doctor, we can't state definitively that the other two were the Shalka Doctor and the ''Fatal Death'' Doctor, but neither can we state definitively that they ''aren't.'' -- [[User:Rowan Earthwood|Rowan Earthwood]] <sup>[[User talk:Rowan Earthwood|talk to me]]</sup> 01:37, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
+:::I don't understand the point you're trying to make.  What good does it do us to ''not'' be able to definitively state something?  All I'm saying is that if we can't definitively say something, then we don't mention it in the in-universe portion of the article.  That said, my reading of our debate on ''Fatal Death'' is that we noted that the exact passages of ''Chronicles'' '''do not match''' Emma, at the very least, and in no way even vaguely suggest Atkinson.
+:::And, I'm sorry, but you're just wrong about licensing.  Ownership is required before licensing is possible.  That's just basic copyright law.  Since the BBC don't own ''Dimension in Time'' in any sort of conventional way, they are not in a position to license it.  The license holders are the participants, and they have withheld all future rights. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">02:26: Tue&nbsp;10 Jul 2012&nbsp;</span>
+== Closing time ==
+Anyway, guys, this thread is about ''Death Comes to Time''.  It would appear that there is consensus on the nation that DCTT is ''not'' within this wiki's scope.  If you want to go on venting about canon in general, you know the way to [[tardis talk:canon policy]].  Unless there are specific arguments for keeping ''Death Comes to Time, this thread will close in 48 hours from the following timestamp. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">02:26: Tue&nbsp;10 Jul 2012&nbsp;</span>
+:(By the way, Rowan, I'm not trying to have the last word on the above points.  Feel free to have the honor of the final reply, cause I'm genuinely interested in what you see is the utility of the "indefinite negative".  But we do need to get this thread closed, since we haven't really talked about ''Death Comes to Time'' for quite a while.)