Hate crime: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "A '''hate crime''' was a crime motivated by prejudice. On the Sunlight Worlds, it was ruled by the Dalek Foundation that claiming the Daleks were evil was a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''hate crime''' was a crime motivated by prejudice. | A '''hate crime''' was a crime motivated by prejudice. | ||
On the [[Sunlight Worlds]], it was ruled by the [[Dalek Foundation]] that claiming the [[Dalek | On the [[Sunlight Worlds]], it was ruled by the [[Dalek Foundation]] that claiming the [[Dalek]]s were evil was an example of a hate crime. The [[Eleventh Doctor]] was put on trial for committing the offence, first on [[Carthedia]] and later on [[Sunlight 349]], both times with the [[Dalek Litigator]] acting as the prosecution. The Doctor pleaded guilty to the crime in attempts to anger the Litigator and get the Dalek to publicly display its true nature but the Litigator did not rise to the bait and the Doctor was exiled from the Sunlight Worlds. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Dalek Generation (novel)|The Dalek Generation]]'') | ||
{{stub}} | |||
[[Category:Crime]] | [[Category:Crime]] | ||
Revision as of 17:00, 9 June 2013
A hate crime was a crime motivated by prejudice.
On the Sunlight Worlds, it was ruled by the Dalek Foundation that claiming the Daleks were evil was an example of a hate crime. The Eleventh Doctor was put on trial for committing the offence, first on Carthedia and later on Sunlight 349, both times with the Dalek Litigator acting as the prosecution. The Doctor pleaded guilty to the crime in attempts to anger the Litigator and get the Dalek to publicly display its true nature but the Litigator did not rise to the bait and the Doctor was exiled from the Sunlight Worlds. (PROSE: The Dalek Generation)
