User talk:Bold Clone: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→‎Death: new section)
(→‎Re: Prologue: new section)
Tag: sourceedit
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=471576 '''2010 Archive''']<br>
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=471576 '''2010 Archive''']<br>
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=491774 '''Jan. '11 Archive''']<br>
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=491774 '''Jan. '11 Archive''']<br>
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=527758 '''Feb. '11 Archive''']
[http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=527758 '''Feb. '11 Archive''']<br>
[http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Bold_Clone?oldid=854805 '''Mar.-Dec. '11 Archive''']
__TOC__
__TOC__
{{welcome||[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:09, June 25, 2010 (UTC)}}
{{welcome||[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:09, June 25, 2010 (UTC)}}


{{please see|Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon?}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''20:42:30 Fri&nbsp;'''11 Mar 2011&nbsp;</span>
== Hey! ==
Hey, haven't seen you around for a while! [[User:Dr. Anonymous1|Dr. Anonymous1]] [[User talk:Dr. Anonymous1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:42, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


== Rumour ==
Yeah, I've been busy over the summer, and now that college has started up again, I still don't have much time to devote to this. But now that Doctor Who has come back (at least for the next month or so), I'll be here at least marginally. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 17:44, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


You removed a valid rumour, but if it's reworded and added liked you told me then we'll leave it. You may use the wording I use at the top of my page, it does help. It really annoying when people post at a random point on you talk page with no heading. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 16:27, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
== Death ==
 
Regeneration is death. It's a way of cheating death, but it is death. The body dies and then new cells grow in it's place. but death happen first. When the Fifth Doctor dies and then becomes the Sixth, he dies. It is the same thing. Sorry to take such a depressing take on all of it, but regeneration ''is'' death. And "Death" is a much better header than "Regeneration", particuarly as every Doctor regenerated twice in his life. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:44, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
{{please see|Aliens and enemies templates: the final battle}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''15:58:29 Tue&nbsp;'''29 Mar 2011&nbsp;</span>Ά
: Besides that point, the Doctor only ''changes'' when he dies. Regeneration is a way to avoid death, but only by means of rejuvenation. When the Seventh Doctor was killed in that hopsital he died. Then he regenerated. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 03:15, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
:: No, he became a stiff. He died. The word "death" has been used multiple time in regeneration stories; including ''[[The Caves of Androzani (TV story)|The Caves of Androzani]]''. Regeneration is the process of being reborn after death. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 04:04, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
== Ref desk ==
::: As the Tenth Doctor said in ''The End of Time'', "Even if I change, it feels like dying. Everything I am dies. Some new man goes sauntering away...and I'm dead." Even if he just changes and goes on, it's still death in a way. ''Everything I am dies.'' The Tenth Doctor, by definition, is now dead. Now we have the Eleventh. But the Tenth is still dead. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 04:33, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
:::: The proplem here is that every Doctor has two regenerations. Putting a section called "Regeneration" on the Tenth Doctor's page, for example, could refer to either ''Parting of The Ways'' or ''The End of Time''. And the death sections on the the [[Third Doctor]]'s page are a must-keep. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 05:07, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
I stuck an Admin-only protection on it, should do the trick. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:58, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
No, no it wouldn't. Sorry to be so nnegative, but "Death" is frankly more interesting and accurate than "Regeneration", and if a fan truly doesn't understand that regeneration is coming back after death than that's not our proplem. We shouldn't structure pages off of the ideals of new fans; if we did we'd be wiping all pre-2005 info off the map. "Death" is a better and less confusing header than "Regeneration". [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 05:44, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
: Yeah, a forum discussion is best for this one; over wheather the Doctor dies and is ressurected or if he simply "changes". Czech would prop def pull out some sources from books and we could come to a consensus. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 22:09, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
== Ref desk ==
:: Might as well move it to the forum. Make the question over whether regeneration is "changing-pre-death" or "rejuvination-post-death". I feel like Czech can get us some quick sources. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 19:35, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
Just noticed you cleared up the reference desk's recent vandalism. I blocked one user ([http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/95.133.47.228 95.133.47.228]) for vandalising it. Do you think this enough? Thanks----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 21:00, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
 
Never mind. Didn't see the above post :)----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 21:00, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Protection length on articles  ==
 
I just saw you post on [[Forum:When can we create "The Impossible Astronaut" page?]], and I just thought I say I agree with you about the protection of main page time. You stated that it should only be a month. I thought I'd just say to you that I may bring this up for discussion in the forums at a later date, and I hope you will be involved in it. The current protection length is one year, which is can be seen as too long. I hope you will take a active role forum. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 14:49, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Suggestion ==
 
Instead of telling people to go to the talk page, why don;t you start by going. Why not just go "Talk page?" start a discussion, that way, you have made the effort to resolve something, instead of just making a situation worse. I had to start to discussion, one because you don't understand the meaning of a rumour. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 19:17, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
I'm gonna say I have to agree with MiniMitch on this one, the person who wants a change to take place on the article should be starting a talk page discussion, not the person who wants to keep it the same. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 19:25, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Spoiler policy ==
 
It always been the UK. An enw episode can air in different countries weeks after the first airing ever (UK airing), it it is ''very'' difficult to control spoilers from the UK airing to the last airing. The main page says this wiki contains spoilers, so people are aware. Also, the episode page gets filled in after the episode has aired,which also includes spoilers.
 
It don't think it is written into the spoiler policy, but it's always been an unwritten rule that it's after the UK air date (or wherever it airs first). Hope this answers your question, and if it does not, feel free to raise it on the forums or ask another admin. Thanks [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 19:50, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Unknown ==
 
Not a problem at all. The field simply disappears if left empty. Magic!----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:39, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Blocking Guidelines  ==
 
I reverted it, as it's not a good idea to give an exact length of time a User would be blocked for, especially when it could be a minor or serious thing, which should have different block lengths. Would a User who sent someone a death treat be blocked for the same length of time as someone who swears at another User? It's something that should be in the policy, as Users could say "I may have sent a User a death treat, but I should only be blocked for 24 hours." When it should be longer. It is something that could be discussed on the forums through. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 19:05, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 
{{Please see|A few changes?}} [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 17:31, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 
== River in the Library ==
 
I'm just wondering why you keep changing my edits to the library section. Firstly, the diary and screwdriver have been previously mentioned, and so no longer need a whole paragraph. Also, her transfer to CAL is rather a big event in her 'life', and so why do you feel it doesn't need its own section? [[User:Geek Mythology|Geek Mythology]] 00:34, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 
{{Please see|Years - Separate pages or Century pages}} [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 14:51, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Revertions ==
 
Thanks for reverting those edits, I've just come back online and seen it all. He's been blocked now, thanks again. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 18:46, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
 
== TARDIS page ==
 
Alot of the edits you made were already reviewed by [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Skittles_the_hog Skittles the hog] and he didn't seem to have any problem with them. They have been on the page awhile.
*"Flight: Irrelevant to flight." - The word flight is a referance to how the TARDIS travels. The article begins by stating "TARDISes most often moved through time and space by "disappearing there and reappearing here"" This was on the page prior to posting the pic. The pic itself shows the TARDIS disappearing.
*"Dimensionally transcendental: Not enought room for both pictures.)" - The pic was there awhile. It was previsly reviewed by [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Skittles_the_hog Skittles the hog] who didn't seem to have a problem with it.
*"Chameleon circuit: Completely irrelevant to the shapeshifting abilities of the chameleon circuit." - The Chameleon Circuit is designed to conceal the TARDIS in order to allow it to blend into it's surroundings like a chameleon. Shapeshifting is one way it does that, but not the only way. Invisibility is the other way. So it does fit under that catagory. [[User:MochaShakaKhan|MochaShakaKhan]] 21:27, July 22, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
<p style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-top: 0.4em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; ">Technically I you haven't given me a reason not to undo your undo, but for arguements sake, personally, would prefer another pic of a newer version of the TARDIS' console, but I disagree in regards to the idea that the console is irrelevant to flight. It belongs on the TARDIS page and in the Flight section. The reason I say this is because it has been demonstrated "that all you need is a console w/ time rotor and three walls to fly through the vortex". We see this in the episode [[The Doctor's Wife]], [[The Doctor's Wife]] is the episode where Idris and The Doctor use left over parts from cannibalized TARDISes abandoned in the Bubble universe's Junkyard to build the [[Junk TARDIS]]. With the junk TARDIS they fly to the Police Box TARDIS which had been hijacked by [[House]]. According to the [[]]junk TARDIS wikia page "'The TARDIS consisted solely of a console (with [[]]time rotor) and three walls. It lacked a proper shell, which the Doctor stated would be very dangerous to travel without." So basically I think this demonstrates that the console is key to time-space flight and that it does belong in the flight section.</p>
 
 
 
<p style="border-width: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0.4em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">My rational for the other two arguements remain the same as before. I have nothing really to add. The pic of the inside of the TARDIS does fit. In regards to invisibility, I think it belongs in the Chameleon Circuit section, but if you want, as a comprimise perhaps we can add the exert I wrote to another section, instead of adding it to the Chameleon Circuit section. Invisibility is a feature of the TARDIS so it does belong somewhere on the page. [[User:MochaShakaKhan|MochaShakaKhan]] 03:51, August 3, 2011 (UTC)</p>


== Silence Edit ==
== Spoiler question ==
Yours is a good question. I had to hunt about on the spoiler policy page before I could find any mention of story titles. I finally found it under "Official Info", where it says, "What, then, do we do with information that comes from a reputable source like the BBC itself? We use it only on the series page. It cannot be used elsewhere. The three biggest types of "official" info are story titles, casting information, and the odd leak of in-universe information."


Why did you remove my edit?
So under normal circumstances, an upcoming story title can go on the related series page. It's just that the 50th anniversary special and the Christmas special are not considered part of series 7 or 8, so there is no place to list their titles before their releases (except of course at the Howling).


{{Please see|Alienation of new and IP users}} [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 20:34, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
Hope that answers your question! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:44, December 20, 2013 (UTC)
:Not sure it's quite as hard to find as Shambala makes out. It's covered at [[T:SPOIL DEF]], which defines a spoiler as "''any'' information about an unbroadcast or unreleased story".  A title would be part of "''any'' information".  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:23: Mon 23 Dec 2013</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}


{{Please see|A second look at wiki achivements}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:20:08 Mon&nbsp;'''22 Aug 2011&nbsp;</span>
I hope I didn't make a mistake with the external link.  I can only open one page at a time on my computer, so I have to read, close, and go back and work.  If I am in error I will do my best not to repeat it.


== Historically famous companions ==
== Re:Quick question ==
Hi! I've added a response to your and [[User:Mewiet]]'s discussion at [[User talk:Shambala108|my talk page]]. Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:23, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
:In order to stop Shambala getting pinged every single time one of you responds, I've moved the matter to the neutral ground of [[Thread:158757]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 04:37: Sun 13 Jul 2014</span>


Hey, MM is saying at [[talk:companion]] that you removed the whole section on historically famous companions.  Could you please head over to the talk page and explain your motivations for that move?  I'm not understanding your objections. Thanks!  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''23:40:25 Thu&nbsp;'''25 Aug 2011&nbsp;</span>
== The Gift ==


== Continued removal of pics at [[the Doctor's TARDIS]] ==
Per [[T:BOUND]], just because you disagree with policy, doesn't mean you can ignore it. You can't simply declare it "invalid". As such I'm going to be enforcing [[Thread:149557]] on the relevant pages, and if you would like to [[T:CHANGE|change policy]], you can bring it up at [[Board:The Panopticon]]. '''[[User:PicassoAndPringles|<span style="color:#002B7F">P&amp;P</span>]] [[User_talk:PicassoAndPringles|<span style="color:#FCD116;font-size:0.6em">talk</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/PicassoAndPringles|<span style="color:#CE1126;font-size:0.6em">contribs</span>]]''' 19:41, September 1, 2014 (UTC)


So I see that you have again removed a picture I put up at [[the Doctor's TARDIS]].  Just as with other pictures I've put onto that article, I was trying to demonstrate features of the exterior of the TARDIS that aren't terribly common knowledge to the [[BBC Wales]]-era fan.  In your latest removal, you've taken down a shot of the windows being propped open, a common happenstance during [[season 2]], but not really seen elsewhere.  Certainly, it's not something which has even been suggested by [[BBC Wales]] ''Doctor Who''. 
== Page moves ==


So why are you averse to '''this'''' image?  Do you believe that the section should only have '''one''' picture?  Is it purely a layout preference?  Cause you haven't removed the associated fact, I don't believe.  Why is it that the only pic you've allowed to stand is the bit from TVC?  I mean, I'm busy around here so I don't have time to monitor the page on even a monthly basis, so it doesn't '''really''' matter to me.  But I occasionally add bits to it when I come across some detail about the TADIS that the article doesn't include.  It just seems weird that you keep batting away my images on the page. And to be honest, it feels like I'm wasting my time capturing these image.
Hi! Please note that, per [[Thread:128198]], only admins are allowed to move pages. By moving Pond Life (webcast) to Pond Life (TV story), you've left behind a redirect that will take some time to clean up. In the future, if something needs to be renamed/moved, please just add a rename tag. Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:05, September 15, 2015 (UTC)


If I knew the criteria you were using to justify your removals — which, by the way, rarely if ever have much of a revision summary — perhaps we could work out some sort of compromise so that I wouldn't be wasting my time putting up an image you're just going to summarily remove. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''02:33:38 Thu&nbsp;'''01 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>
== Re: Prologue ==


== River Song ==
Hi! I don't know the answer to your question (I haven't even seen the story yet), but I will start a forum page to see what other users can tell us. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:37, September 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
Just to let you know that I keep scrubbing the River Song page.  It's long and is only going to get longer, so I am working hard to make sure that the long, rambling,flabby, fuzzy, almost-the-right-word c**p that infests a lot of the writing here does not show up there. Of course, this means that occasionally, in  my efforts, I will remove a word that I should not have.  Vigilance! [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 23:24, September 1, 2011 (UTC)
 
== The lake and River Song ==
 
I'm not going to chnage it until we have a clear vote. What would I gain from removing those lines in the middle of a vote, people need to know what's currently written. That's why I'll give it a few days, and if the vote says "yes" to removing it, we'll remove it, if it's "no", we won't.
 
Until then, it stays. Like I said: people need to knows what's there and what's being removed. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 21:12, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Artefacts? ==
 
I recently saw you removed my edit to the Alien "Artefacts" page when i fixed the incorrect spelling of Artifact. You see, Artefact refers to some french heavy metal band ad not an object like and Artifact which does refer to an object. So whhy change it to something it obviously isnt. For me reading the article as it was with Artefact and knowing its spelled Artifact and what Artefact means annoys me so i went to fix it, yet you reverted my edit for no reason and hence,degraded the page.[[User:TheFourteenthDoctor|TheFourteenthDoctor]] 03:47, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Well where should it go then? ==
It's a legitimate fact  - with a link to back it up.  If it doesn't go in the story notes, then where does it go??? -- [[User:MisterRandom2|MisterRandom2]] <sup>[[User talk:MisterRandom2|talk to me]]</sup> 23:57, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}04:22: Tue&nbsp;20 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}18:24: Thu&nbsp;22 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>
 
== Hey! ==
 
Hey, haven't seen you around for a while! [[User:Dr. Anonymous1|Dr. Anonymous1]] [[User talk:Dr. Anonymous1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:42, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
 
Yeah, I've been busy over the summer, and now that college has started up again, I still don't have much time to devote to this. But now that Doctor Who has come back (at least for the next month or so), I'll be here at least marginally. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 17:44, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
 
== Death ==
 
Regeneration is death. It's a way of cheating death, but it is death. The body dies and then new cells grow in it's place. but death happen first. When the Fifth Doctor dies and then becomes the Sixth, he dies. It is the same thing. Sorry to take such a depressing take on all of it, but regeneration ''is'' death. And "Death" is a much better header than "Regeneration", particuarly as every Doctor regenerated twice in his life. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:44, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:37, 18 September 2015

Please leave all new messages at the bottom of the page. Also, please make a new heading for each separate discussion, and sign all message as well. Comments that are unsigned, rude, a personal attack, and/or vandalism will be either ignored or deleted. You have been warned, and thank you for reading this.

2010 Archive
Jan. '11 Archive
Feb. '11 Archive
Mar.-Dec. '11 Archive

Welcome to the
Site-logo.png
• Bold Clone •

Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.

British English, please

We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.

Spoilers aren't cool

We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.

Other useful stuff

Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.


Hey![[edit source]]

Hey, haven't seen you around for a while! Dr. Anonymous1 ☎ 17:42, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been busy over the summer, and now that college has started up again, I still don't have much time to devote to this. But now that Doctor Who has come back (at least for the next month or so), I'll be here at least marginally. --Bold Clone 17:44, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Death[[edit source]]

Regeneration is death. It's a way of cheating death, but it is death. The body dies and then new cells grow in it's place. but death happen first. When the Fifth Doctor dies and then becomes the Sixth, he dies. It is the same thing. Sorry to take such a depressing take on all of it, but regeneration is death. And "Death" is a much better header than "Regeneration", particuarly as every Doctor regenerated twice in his life. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:44, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Besides that point, the Doctor only changes when he dies. Regeneration is a way to avoid death, but only by means of rejuvenation. When the Seventh Doctor was killed in that hopsital he died. Then he regenerated. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 03:15, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
No, he became a stiff. He died. The word "death" has been used multiple time in regeneration stories; including The Caves of Androzani. Regeneration is the process of being reborn after death. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 04:04, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
As the Tenth Doctor said in The End of Time, "Even if I change, it feels like dying. Everything I am dies. Some new man goes sauntering away...and I'm dead." Even if he just changes and goes on, it's still death in a way. Everything I am dies. The Tenth Doctor, by definition, is now dead. Now we have the Eleventh. But the Tenth is still dead. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 04:33, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
The proplem here is that every Doctor has two regenerations. Putting a section called "Regeneration" on the Tenth Doctor's page, for example, could refer to either Parting of The Ways or The End of Time. And the death sections on the the Third Doctor's page are a must-keep. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 05:07, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

No, no it wouldn't. Sorry to be so nnegative, but "Death" is frankly more interesting and accurate than "Regeneration", and if a fan truly doesn't understand that regeneration is coming back after death than that's not our proplem. We shouldn't structure pages off of the ideals of new fans; if we did we'd be wiping all pre-2005 info off the map. "Death" is a better and less confusing header than "Regeneration". OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 05:44, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, a forum discussion is best for this one; over wheather the Doctor dies and is ressurected or if he simply "changes". Czech would prop def pull out some sources from books and we could come to a consensus. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 22:09, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Might as well move it to the forum. Make the question over whether regeneration is "changing-pre-death" or "rejuvination-post-death". I feel like Czech can get us some quick sources. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 19:35, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Spoiler question[[edit source]]

Yours is a good question. I had to hunt about on the spoiler policy page before I could find any mention of story titles. I finally found it under "Official Info", where it says, "What, then, do we do with information that comes from a reputable source like the BBC itself? We use it only on the series page. It cannot be used elsewhere. The three biggest types of "official" info are story titles, casting information, and the odd leak of in-universe information."

So under normal circumstances, an upcoming story title can go on the related series page. It's just that the 50th anniversary special and the Christmas special are not considered part of series 7 or 8, so there is no place to list their titles before their releases (except of course at the Howling).

Hope that answers your question! Shambala108 ☎ 20:44, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

Not sure it's quite as hard to find as Shambala makes out. It's covered at T:SPOIL DEF, which defines a spoiler as "any information about an unbroadcast or unreleased story". A title would be part of "any information".
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  16:23: Mon 23 Dec 2013

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png


I hope I didn't make a mistake with the external link. I can only open one page at a time on my computer, so I have to read, close, and go back and work. If I am in error I will do my best not to repeat it.

Re:Quick question[[edit source]]

Hi! I've added a response to your and User:Mewiet's discussion at my talk page. Thanks! Shambala108 ☎ 14:23, July 12, 2014 (UTC)

In order to stop Shambala getting pinged every single time one of you responds, I've moved the matter to the neutral ground of Thread:158757.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  04:37: Sun 13 Jul 2014

The Gift[[edit source]]

Per T:BOUND, just because you disagree with policy, doesn't mean you can ignore it. You can't simply declare it "invalid". As such I'm going to be enforcing Thread:149557 on the relevant pages, and if you would like to change policy, you can bring it up at Board:The Panopticon. P&P talk contribs 19:41, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Page moves[[edit source]]

Hi! Please note that, per Thread:128198, only admins are allowed to move pages. By moving Pond Life (webcast) to Pond Life (TV story), you've left behind a redirect that will take some time to clean up. In the future, if something needs to be renamed/moved, please just add a rename tag. Thanks! Shambala108 ☎ 02:05, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Prologue[[edit source]]

Hi! I don't know the answer to your question (I haven't even seen the story yet), but I will start a forum page to see what other users can tell us. Shambala108 ☎ 02:37, September 18, 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bold_Clone&oldid=1933218"