Talk:Clifford Jones: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-Global Conspiracy +Global Conspiracy?)) Tag: apiedit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
When I encountered it, article had this material: | When I encountered it, article had this material: | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
[[File:CliffordJonesIn2004-GlobalConspiracyDVDExtra.jpg|thumb|left|Clifford Jones in 2004.([[HOMEVID]]: ''[[Global Conspiracy]]'')]] | [[File:CliffordJonesIn2004-GlobalConspiracyDVDExtra.jpg|thumb|left|Clifford Jones in 2004.([[HOMEVID]]: ''[[Global Conspiracy? (home video)|Global Conspiracy?]]'')]] | ||
:He stated in the 2004 ''[[Global Conspiracy]]'' DVD extra accompanying ''[[The Green Death (TV story)|The Green Death]]'' that he and Jo divorced, and that his "Nuthutch Foods" company successfully marketed products derived from his fungus research. | :He stated in the 2004 ''[[Global Conspiracy? (home video)|Global Conspiracy?]]'' DVD extra accompanying ''[[The Green Death (TV story)|The Green Death]]'' that he and Jo divorced, and that his "Nuthutch Foods" company successfully marketed products derived from his fungus research. | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
I've removed this here for further discussion. In the first place, there's no doubt that this is written in a way contrary to [[T:PERSPECTIVE]]. We always write in-universe material in the past tense, and in an in-universe way. Thus, "he stated in the 2004 DVD extra accompanying ''The Green Death''" is [[T:EVIL TWIN|written completely the opposite way to how we normally write articles]]. In the second, we'd need to discuss whether ''Global Conspiracy'' "counts" as a true narrative, and is therefore a [[T:VS|valid source]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 03:57: Sat 01 Dec 2012</span> | I've removed this here for further discussion. In the first place, there's no doubt that this is written in a way contrary to [[T:PERSPECTIVE]]. We always write in-universe material in the past tense, and in an in-universe way. Thus, "he stated in the 2004 DVD extra accompanying ''The Green Death''" is [[T:EVIL TWIN|written completely the opposite way to how we normally write articles]]. In the second, we'd need to discuss whether ''Global Conspiracy'' "counts" as a true narrative, and is therefore a [[T:VS|valid source]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 03:57: Sat 01 Dec 2012</span> | ||
Revision as of 05:14, 24 December 2016
"Again married"
I prefer the previous version, which just presented them as conflicting accounts. SJA says "still married" doesn't it? Besides which, the other was in the 1990s and they had one pre-teen son, I thought. Santiago would have already been born by then (I think - or was it earlier 90s?), and he wasn't mentioned. Not to mention six other kids that she's unlikely to have acquired since then (or to have not been mentioned if her son wasn't specified as an only child in Genocide). And plus she was living a settled life at that point, which is also somewhat contradictory to her life as depected in SJA. Tzigone 20:56, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
Green Death DVD extra excised
When I encountered it, article had this material:
- He stated in the 2004 Global Conspiracy? DVD extra accompanying The Green Death that he and Jo divorced, and that his "Nuthutch Foods" company successfully marketed products derived from his fungus research.
I've removed this here for further discussion. In the first place, there's no doubt that this is written in a way contrary to T:PERSPECTIVE. We always write in-universe material in the past tense, and in an in-universe way. Thus, "he stated in the 2004 DVD extra accompanying The Green Death" is written completely the opposite way to how we normally write articles. In the second, we'd need to discuss whether Global Conspiracy "counts" as a true narrative, and is therefore a valid source.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 03:57: Sat 01 Dec 2012
