Talk:Pauline Quirke: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Tag: sourceedit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Prop delete ==
== Prop delete ==


Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given [[User:CzechOut]]'s comments at [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER#Ads aren't stories]], "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given [[User:CzechOut]]'s comments at [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER/Archive 1#Ads aren't stories]], "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC)


:I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
:I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
Line 8: Line 8:


:::characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
:::characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
:::: Can we received CzechOut's opinion on the matter?  [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:24, November 4, 2016 (UTC)
You might think CzechOut meant something, but until/unless he chimes in here, his comments have to speak for themselves, and he specifically said the "campaign itself only". [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:34, 21 March 2017

Prop delete[[edit source]]

Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given User:CzechOut's comments at User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER/Archive 1#Ads aren't stories, "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. Shambala108 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC)

I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. Denchen 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
Like I said in the post immediately above, I'm just going by User:CzechOut's comments saying that we will only cover the campaign itself. If this actor has done nothing else in the DWU besides this campaign, then I don't think she needs a page. Shambala108 13:48, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. Denchen 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
Can we received CzechOut's opinion on the matter? Denchen 21:24, November 4, 2016 (UTC)

You might think CzechOut meant something, but until/unless he chimes in here, his comments have to speak for themselves, and he specifically said the "campaign itself only". Shambala108 01:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)