Talk:Pauline Quirke: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Prop delete == | == Prop delete == | ||
Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given [[User:CzechOut]]'s comments at [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER#Ads aren't stories]], "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given [[User:CzechOut]]'s comments at [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER/Archive 1#Ads aren't stories]], "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | :I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | :::characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::: Can we received CzechOut's opinion on the matter? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|Denchen ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:24, November 4, 2016 (UTC) | |||
You might think CzechOut meant something, but until/unless he chimes in here, his comments have to speak for themselves, and he specifically said the "campaign itself only". [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:34, 21 March 2017
Prop delete[[edit source]]
Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given User:CzechOut's comments at User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER/Archive 1#Ads aren't stories, "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. Shambala108 ☎ 00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
- I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. Denchen ☎ 07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Like I said in the post immediately above, I'm just going by User:CzechOut's comments saying that we will only cover the campaign itself. If this actor has done nothing else in the DWU besides this campaign, then I don't think she needs a page. Shambala108 ☎ 13:48, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
- characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. Denchen ☎ 21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
You might think CzechOut meant something, but until/unless he chimes in here, his comments have to speak for themselves, and he specifically said the "campaign itself only". Shambala108 ☎ 01:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)