Talk:Infinity Doctor: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
==Alternate?==
==Alternate?==
Okay, so I'm looking at the page and it says, "in an alternate universe", but on a lot of the character's pages, it states that it takes place in the main? Like, I know it doesn't fit with the continuity, but when has ''Doctor Who'' ever? [[User:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived]] [[User talk:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:14, June 8, 2020 (UTC)
Okay, so I'm looking at the page and it says, "in an alternate universe", but on a lot of the character's pages, it states that it takes place in the main? Like, I know it doesn't fit with the continuity, but when has ''Doctor Who'' ever? [[User:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived]] [[User talk:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:14, June 8, 2020 (UTC)
: I'm not sure on the precise details, but here are two threads which have some relevance to your question:
:* [[Forum:Is The Infinity Doctors canon?]]
:* [[Forum:Operationalising the Infinity Doctors discussion]]
: [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:37, June 8, 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:37, 8 June 2020

Recent rename

Correct me if I am wrong, but the previous name, "The Doctor (The Infinity Doctors universe)" was in line with Tardis:Disambiguating other realities. Amorkuz 22:12, October 30, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, from my understanding of the policy this page shouldn't have been moved.
It's part of an overall problem where some users are using the speedy rename tag in cases where the rename isn't obvious to the admins that will be performing the move. This page had a speedy rename tag, and User:Doug86 moved it. (I've been trying to clean up the speedy renames, and specifically avoided this one because I didn't know if it deserved the speedy tag or not.)
I think that we might want to consider requiring users to give a reason for the speedy renames on the talk pages so admins who aren't familiar with the articles in question have enough information to decide if the article deserves a speedy rename tag, a rename tag, or no tag. Shambala108 22:55, October 30, 2017 (UTC)
Yes, supplying speedy renames with (short) reasons is a very good idea. The situation I ran into several times was when a speedy rename had been placed because of a conflict with a character from a newly released story, and the page for this character had not yet been created. In such cases, to understand what is going on, the admin must either be psychic or have in-depth knowledge of the exact new story that is never mentioned in the speedy rename tag. Amorkuz 06:23, October 31, 2017 (UTC)

I'll freely admit that I'd forgotten about T:DAB OTHER when I put up the rename template; I was just going off of the precedent of The Doctor (Auld Mortality), Third Doctor (Exile), etc. (And my complaints against DAB OTHER in general still apply, of course, but T:BOUND is T:BOUND.) For a while now, I've tried to catalogue my rename reasons on my user page; officialising such a thing in regards to the Talk page would make a lot of sense, I think. – N8 16:12, October 31, 2017 (UTC)

Alternate?

Okay, so I'm looking at the page and it says, "in an alternate universe", but on a lot of the character's pages, it states that it takes place in the main? Like, I know it doesn't fit with the continuity, but when has Doctor Who ever? Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived 13:14, June 8, 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure on the precise details, but here are two threads which have some relevance to your question:
Danochy 13:37, June 8, 2020 (UTC)