1
edit
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:The only sources for the [[Tardis:In-universe perspective|in-universe section of articles]] is the stories themselves. As for behind the scenes, I think your first source, as a message board, wouldn't be considered a valid source, and your second source is a video, which we cannot link to per [[Tardis:Video policy]]. In my opinion, these sources are word-of-mouth and not really official enough to use at sources. Thanks, [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:23, December 12, 2017 (UTC) | :The only sources for the [[Tardis:In-universe perspective|in-universe section of articles]] is the stories themselves. As for behind the scenes, I think your first source, as a message board, wouldn't be considered a valid source, and your second source is a video, which we cannot link to per [[Tardis:Video policy]]. In my opinion, these sources are word-of-mouth and not really official enough to use at sources. Thanks, [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:23, December 12, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Sorry about the video, this was actually a comment under it saying roughly the same thing as the forum account but I don't think we can link to only the comment section anymore... To be clear this is not just behind the scenes stuff since this is what they allegedly saw when it was broadcast on TV: people accounts are the only to know what occured on-screen for wiped stories (is there even a precedent for things like that on the wiki ?). Even though I believe that they are saying the truth, I fully agree with you that my sources are not trustable enough for the wiki articles. However I would find it strange that nobody else ever mentionned it (in an interview or a DWM summary of the story for example): I began the discussion mostly to check if someone remember seeing it in a more official testimony.[[User:RingoRoadagain|RingoRoadagain]] [[User talk:RingoRoadagain|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:00, December 12, 2017 (UTC) | :Sorry about the video, this was actually a comment under it saying roughly the same thing as the forum account but I don't think we can link to only the comment section anymore... To be clear this is not just behind the scenes stuff since this is what they allegedly saw when it was broadcast on TV: people accounts are the only to know what occured on-screen for wiped stories (is there even a precedent for things like that on the wiki ?). Even though I believe that they are saying the truth, I fully agree with you that my sources are not trustable enough for the wiki articles. However I would find it strange that nobody else ever mentionned it (in an interview or a DWM summary of the story for example): I began the discussion mostly to check if someone remember seeing it in a more official testimony.[[User:RingoRoadagain|RingoRoadagain]] [[User talk:RingoRoadagain|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:00, December 12, 2017 (UTC) | ||
Hey, all. Very late to the programme, enjoying the early black-and-white episodes for the very first time. | |||
Finishing "The Massacre of St. Bartholomew's Eve" just now, but wondering if there's been any comment on how ludicrously violent and politically uninteresting this serial would've been to the children watching in 1966. For a children's show, the public outcry must've been fantastic, yet I've only been able to locate a single YT commentator that might broach the subject (haven't viewed it yet, as I'm waiting 'til I finish the serial's finale in a moment). | |||
As a fan, I was enthralled with this story, but I can't imagine children or their parents were very pleased with it at all. Anyone know where I could travel back in time to 1966 to read about the public's reaction for this particular serial? | |||
--[[User:Dont Panic Dent|Dont Panic Dent]] [[User talk:Dont Panic Dent|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:53, August 20, 2020 (UTC) | |||