Talk:Adventures in Lockdown

The webcasts

Since this is a prose anthology, I'm going to assume that the webcasts listed are novelisations? Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎ 19:15, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

Well, short-story-izations. And since many of them were just people reading things, it could just be the text they read. But someone went and linked to the webcasts, etc, even though I explicitly did not link to those when I created the page. I've delinked them now. Najawin ☎ 19:35, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

All but two of the webcasts in this anthology were effectively just narrated short stories. Not sure of the precedent here, but unless they add anything to the original story, I'd wager it's not worth creating new pages when there's not any new information in them. It's worth waiting to see what the actual release holds, of course, before making any decisions. Danochy ☎ 22:47, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

Listen (webcast) is a narrated poem even. I'm sure there's precedent for a novelization literally not adding any content to the TV story, so that seems similar enough?

Far more interesting to me is that, while our Lockdown thread is, uh, no longer with us, this publication seems to circumnavigate both the question of whether these stories were licensed or whether Doctor Who Lockdown contains the Prose stories listed online. Not exactly answering either question, but answering a question similar to each one. Najawin ☎ 22:58, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

Novelisations add new content by virtue of being a completely different medium. If the short story versions are word-for-word the same, there's no point in creating a new page. We don't create new pages when a short story is narrated (Category:Prose stories with audiobook readings), why would we treat it any differently if it occurred in reverse?

Obviously this wouldn't be the case for the short story-isations of Rory's Story and Message from the Doctor as they were not narrated. Danochy ☎ 23:04, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

Audiobooks can add new content, be it pronunciation or tone. It depends on the quality of the narrator. There is, however, a long and storied tradition of considering it the same work as the original book, which isn't inherently the case with novelizations. (Though I note here that this wiki does go against tradition at times such as the decision to treat gameplay as narrative for video games.) Quite honestly I'm not sure how I feel about this issue and would love a broader range of perspectives, I just am not compelled by these arguments. Najawin ☎ 23:12, October 16, 2020 (UTC)

Audiobook readings may add new value, or bring a new interpretation, but they do not add content. The Time of Angels is an adaptation of the original, even if it does not add altogether new information, by virtue of having been changed to suit the medium (entry-level English novelisation). Doctor Who and the Star Beast also counts separately, despite being largely faithful, because they were changed to suit the dramatised audio form. On the other hand, a Short Trips short story given an audio version for Subscriber Short Trips is essentially just an audiobook reading, and a BBC Audio reading even more so. In broad terms, if a Short Trips original audio story was later collected as a short story in a prose anthology, it would no be treated as a separate work, any more than it is the other way around, per T:NPOV.
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 03:41, October 17, 2020 (UTC)

I, of course, strongly disagree over what "content" entails here, but I defer to you on what the actual policy is with regards to this page. Najawin ☎ 04:52, October 17, 2020 (UTC)

The precedent I'd work from relative to covering the short stories separately from the webcasts is Shada-the-WC vs. Shada-the-audio-story. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 08:53, October 17, 2020 (UTC)