Talk:Erasmus Darkening: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Goo) Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Darkening looks very timelordy, possibly a version of [[The Monk]]?[[User:Invictus152|Invictus152]] 10:55, July 4, 2010 (UTC) | Darkening looks very timelordy, possibly a version of [[The Monk]]?[[User:Invictus152|Invictus152]] 10:55, July 4, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Why is all the information from [[Haunted House (novelisation m)|Haunted House]] relegated to the “behind the scenes” section. To my knowledge, this nobelstions hasn’t been marked as “INVLSDI”, and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adoatiation in Doctor Who, and equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in t main section and simply do the “according to o me account” tying. | Why is all the information from [[The Haunted House (novelisation m)|The Haunted House]] relegated to the “behind the scenes” section. To my knowledge, this nobelstions hasn’t been marked as “INVLSDI”, and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adoatiation in Doctor Who, and equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in t main section and simply do the “according to o me account” tying. | ||
== Why is all the information from [[Haunted House (novelisation)|Haunted House]] relegated to the “behind the scenes” section? To my knowledge, this novelisation hasn’t been marked as “INVALID and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adaptation in Doctor Who, an equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in the main section and simply do the “according to one account”/“according to another account” thing. == | == Why is all the information from [[The Haunted House (novelisation)|The Haunted House]] relegated to the “behind the scenes” section? To my knowledge, this novelisation hasn’t been marked as “INVALID and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adaptation in Doctor Who, an equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in the main section and simply do the “according to one account”/“according to another account” thing. == | ||
Sorry, my computer isn’t connected Ming to the internet and this site is a night mare on mobile, not sure how this works or what I’m doing | Sorry, my computer isn’t connected Ming to the internet and this site is a night mare on mobile, not sure how this works or what I’m doing | ||
Latest revision as of 02:22, 3 December 2020
This page is written out of universe and is in the wrong tense. --Catkind121 15:47, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Darkening looks very timelordy, possibly a version of The Monk?Invictus152 10:55, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Why is all the information from The Haunted House relegated to the “behind the scenes” section. To my knowledge, this nobelstions hasn’t been marked as “INVLSDI”, and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adoatiation in Doctor Who, and equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in t main section and simply do the “according to o me account” tying.
Why is all the information from The Haunted House relegated to the “behind the scenes” section? To my knowledge, this novelisation hasn’t been marked as “INVALID and we consider novelisations of TV stories, just like any other type of adaptation in Doctor Who, an equally valid account of events. Surely we should put both in the main section and simply do the “according to one account”/“according to another account” thing.[[edit source]]
Sorry, my computer isn’t connected Ming to the internet and this site is a night mare on mobile, not sure how this works or what I’m doing
