User talk:Bongolium500: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== Re: The Daft Dimension == A pleasure to see a new user going into such details and minutiae of dabbing policy! It's worth noting that the ''Daft Dimension'' naming scheme i...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Beyond that, I'm sure people like [[User:Borisashton]] will have an opinion on this issue, so you'd best copy over the text of your message to [[Talk:The Daft Dimension]] so that more people can participate. I think the current way is fine, personally — IIRC ''Doctor Who?'' strips aren't numbered, although I'm not sure if ''Daft Dimension'' ones are, so it's easier for readers wanting to track down the story to have the number of the issue, rather than the number of the story itself within the series, since that number is not present anywhere in the actual stories. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC) | Beyond that, I'm sure people like [[User:Borisashton]] will have an opinion on this issue, so you'd best copy over the text of your message to [[Talk:The Daft Dimension]] so that more people can participate. I think the current way is fine, personally — IIRC ''Doctor Who?'' strips aren't numbered, although I'm not sure if ''Daft Dimension'' ones are, so it's easier for readers wanting to track down the story to have the number of the issue, rather than the number of the story itself within the series, since that number is not present anywhere in the actual stories. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Thank you for the speedy response. As I mentioned, I am new here and so I'm not sure if I'm supposed to reply here or on your talk page. I hadn't even thought to put this on [[Talk: The Daft Dimension]] so I will do that right away. them you. | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 28 March 2021
Re: The Daft Dimension
A pleasure to see a new user going into such details and minutiae of dabbing policy! It's worth noting that the Daft Dimension naming scheme is identical to the one used for the Quinn & Howett Doctor Who? stories, which is massive enough that even if it isn't currently recorded in policy, the way of translating "Doctor Who? (DWM 103 comic story)" into a "(Doctor Who? 103)" dab term can, by now, be considered "current policy" in th T:BOUND sense of the term.
Beyond that, I'm sure people like User:Borisashton will have an opinion on this issue, so you'd best copy over the text of your message to Talk:The Daft Dimension so that more people can participate. I think the current way is fine, personally — IIRC Doctor Who? strips aren't numbered, although I'm not sure if Daft Dimension ones are, so it's easier for readers wanting to track down the story to have the number of the issue, rather than the number of the story itself within the series, since that number is not present anywhere in the actual stories. Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 20:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the speedy response. As I mentioned, I am new here and so I'm not sure if I'm supposed to reply here or on your talk page. I hadn't even thought to put this on Talk: The Daft Dimension so I will do that right away. them you.
