Talk:Death Comes to Time (webcast): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Why non-canon?: new section) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Why non-canon? == | == Why non-canon? == | ||
I'm curious as to why ''Death Comes to Time'' is not considered canon by the wiki. Has there been an official statement made to that effect? I see another webcast story, [[Real Time (webcast)]], isn't shunted off that way. True, the ending throws a spanner into continuity, but it's hardly the first - it could be said the 1996 TV movie does far worse. [[Special:Contributions/70.72.211.35|70.72.211.35]]<sup>[[User talk:70.72.211.35#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:17, March 17, 2013 (UTC) | I'm curious as to why ''Death Comes to Time'' is not considered canon by the wiki. Has there been an official statement made to that effect? I see another webcast story, [[Real Time (webcast)]], isn't shunted off that way. True, the ending throws a spanner into continuity, but it's hardly the first to do that - it could be said the 1996 TV movie does far worse. [[Special:Contributions/70.72.211.35|70.72.211.35]]<sup>[[User talk:70.72.211.35#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:17, March 17, 2013 (UTC) | ||
:See [[Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time]]. It should answer some of your questions. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:22, March 17, 2013 (UTC) | |||
:: How is the Doctor dying and all of Gallifrey being destroyed not as bad as what "the 1996 TV movie" did? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 20:34, March 17, 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: You clearly weren't around to see the fandom meltdown when the Doctor declared himself to be half-human. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] [[User talk:23skidoo|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:14, June 23, 2017 (UTC) | |||
:For those curious, I have seen many users express a wish for this to be deemed "valid" once forums are returned. Most likely some wide reaching canon debates and why the rules are the way they are discussions will be had, with Death Comes To Time one of many stories impacted [[User:Editoronthewiki|Editoronthewiki]] [[User talk:Editoronthewiki|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
==The website for ''The Minister of Chance''== | |||
Okay, so I clicked on the link for the website and uhhh, it does not look like that is at all related to ''The Minister of Chance''. Does anyone know what happened? [[User:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived]] [[User talk:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:40, October 8, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:36, 23 December 2022
Why non-canon?[[edit source]]
I'm curious as to why Death Comes to Time is not considered canon by the wiki. Has there been an official statement made to that effect? I see another webcast story, Real Time (webcast), isn't shunted off that way. True, the ending throws a spanner into continuity, but it's hardly the first to do that - it could be said the 1996 TV movie does far worse. 70.72.211.35talk to me 20:17, March 17, 2013 (UTC)
- See Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time. It should answer some of your questions. Shambala108 ☎ 20:22, March 17, 2013 (UTC)
- How is the Doctor dying and all of Gallifrey being destroyed not as bad as what "the 1996 TV movie" did? OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 20:34, March 17, 2013 (UTC)
- For those curious, I have seen many users express a wish for this to be deemed "valid" once forums are returned. Most likely some wide reaching canon debates and why the rules are the way they are discussions will be had, with Death Comes To Time one of many stories impacted Editoronthewiki ☎ 03:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
The website for The Minister of Chance[[edit source]]
Okay, so I clicked on the link for the website and uhhh, it does not look like that is at all related to The Minister of Chance. Does anyone know what happened? Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎ 14:40, October 8, 2020 (UTC)
