2,240
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
This conversation also brings us into the topic of lost media, which we also need to discuss at some point as it applies to some of these stories. If we can fit that in seems debatable tho. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | This conversation also brings us into the topic of lost media, which we also need to discuss at some point as it applies to some of these stories. If we can fit that in seems debatable tho. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I support dabbing both unproduced and unreleased stories. If there is a concern over too many different dabs (which I would not share, in this case), then I would suggest we use "unreleased" rather than "unproduced," as that is the more inclusive category. [[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | :I support dabbing both unproduced and unreleased stories. If there is a concern over too many different dabs (which I would not share, in this case), then I would suggest we use "unreleased" rather than "unproduced," as that is the more inclusive category. [[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
i fully '''support''' the proposal to dab all unproduced stories, to differentiate between unproduced and unreleased stories, and also dabbing unreleased stories. [[User:Pluto2|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
edits