Talk:The Last of the Daleks (illustration): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "This page should not be merged and remain separate. There's a good case to argue it is separate in the same way The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion have separate pages or The Impossible Astronaut prequel has a separate page or Sir Ian's Crusade and The Crusade or the preludes and the VNA books and so on... It also makes coverage easier with the meta fictional angle being easier to handle if separated from this. ~~~~") Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Merge == | |||
This page should not be merged and remain separate. There's a good case to argue it is separate in the same way The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion have separate pages or The Impossible Astronaut prequel has a separate page or Sir Ian's Crusade and The Crusade or the preludes and the VNA books and so on... It also makes coverage easier with the meta fictional angle being easier to handle if separated from this. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 02:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC) | This page should not be merged and remain separate. There's a good case to argue it is separate in the same way The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion have separate pages or The Impossible Astronaut prequel has a separate page or Sir Ian's Crusade and The Crusade or the preludes and the VNA books and so on... It also makes coverage easier with the meta fictional angle being easier to handle if separated from this. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 02:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: No, because this is not a prequel or a separate episode or an introductory short or a prelude. It's an illustration which is literally within the feature itself. It's clearly part of it. Does the illustration even have a title, or is that just made up from the story it's depicting? Part of title of the feature is even shown on the infobox image of the illustration. This doesn't make anything easier to cover, it just confusingly suggests that it's a separate piece when it isn't. If we do this, are we going to start making pages for every illustration which accompanies prose? [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:03, 18 March 2023
Merge
This page should not be merged and remain separate. There's a good case to argue it is separate in the same way The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion have separate pages or The Impossible Astronaut prequel has a separate page or Sir Ian's Crusade and The Crusade or the preludes and the VNA books and so on... It also makes coverage easier with the meta fictional angle being easier to handle if separated from this. 81.108.82.15talk to me 02:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, because this is not a prequel or a separate episode or an introductory short or a prelude. It's an illustration which is literally within the feature itself. It's clearly part of it. Does the illustration even have a title, or is that just made up from the story it's depicting? Part of title of the feature is even shown on the infobox image of the illustration. This doesn't make anything easier to cover, it just confusingly suggests that it's a separate piece when it isn't. If we do this, are we going to start making pages for every illustration which accompanies prose? Danochy ☎ 22:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
