User talk:81.108.82.15

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference

Re: Weetabix[[edit source]]

(I'm not sure if you'll see this message, but I feel it best to send here anyway; this is easier with people logged into accounts)

I've uploaded an image of the Supreme Dalek shouting "Exterminate" from near the end of the trailer, as requested. Cookieboy 2005 21:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Pudsey[[edit source]]

Hey, hard to contact anon users, but this is the best way I've got. I'm not sure that Looking for Pudsey ever had a discussion. User:DENCH-and-PALMER created it as invalid. Epsilon and I were a bit confused as to why some of the charity skits were valid and others weren't a few years back (see Talk:One Born Every Minute (TV story)) but there was no obvious answer at that time (Scrooge's comments notwithstanding, he himself noted it was complicated and might need a forum discussion). If there was a discussion, it would have been in the deleted forums which nobody can access, and I can't find any evidence of it on DENCH's user talk or the page's talk or history. I think this was just an oversight, or it was invalid because it was a crossover or something like that. A Rose by Any Other Name has been valid for ages and is humorous. I can't be more helpful since I wasn't around when the page was made, sorry. But I don't think humor has anything to do with Pudsey being invalid. We very much allow humorous stories to be valid. And even if we didn't, the CoFD thread would have overturned the prior decisions otherwise. Cheers! Najawin 01:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I didn't ask you a question that I can recall, so your message has left me a bit confused. (With that said, I understand your desire for privacy, such as it is, since I don't talk to people off wiki myself.) I'm not sure what question you're inferring, politely. Perhaps it's a tacit question for evidence that humor was involved in the story's invalidity? But even if this were true, it would simply be a mistake in the decision. Humor is explicitly not disqualifying per other precedents. Feel no need to respond, I understand the desire for privacy/a low profile. Najawin 01:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.