Talk:The Last of the Daleks (illustration)

Merge

This page should not be merged and remain separate. There's a good case to argue it is separate in the same way The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion have separate pages or The Impossible Astronaut prequel has a separate page or Sir Ian's Crusade and The Crusade or the preludes and the VNA books and so on... It also makes coverage easier with the meta fictional angle being easier to handle if separated from this. 81.108.82.15^{talk to me} 02:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

No, because this is not a prequel or a separate episode or an introductory short or a prelude. It's an illustration which is literally within the feature itself. It's clearly part of it. Does the illustration even have a title, or is that just made up from the story it's depicting? Part of title of the feature is even shown on the infobox image of the illustration. This doesn't make anything easier to cover, it just confusingly suggests that it's a separate piece when it isn't. If we do this, are we going to start making pages for every illustration which accompanies prose? Danochy ☎ 22:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

I concede. I do think coverage is easier this way, but I'll concede. I'll transfer the information on this page over to the feature. Feel free to delete this page. 81.108.82.15^{talk to me} 22:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Re-reading my comment above I realise I was unncessarily harsh, when I prefer to and usually do argue my points calmy. So my appologies for that! On coverage being easier, I do see your point, but it really wouldn't be that hard to reference the feature for the fictional content and have a subsection in the page's article. Perhaps this page could even become a subpage of What If? (feature), if the new rules allow. Danochy ☎ 22:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Not harsh at all don't worry. I've decided to use What If? (feature)#The Last of the Daleks if a specific part is to be referenced. 81.108.82.15^{talk to me} 22:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)