Talk:Truth or Consequences (short story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
Line 4: Line 4:
In fact in the intro to the story Moffat says it’s the shortest ''Doctor Who'' story ever so it’s intended to be in the DWU.
In fact in the intro to the story Moffat says it’s the shortest ''Doctor Who'' story ever so it’s intended to be in the DWU.
[[Special:Contributions/81.106.187.1|81.106.187.1]]<sup>[[User talk:81.106.187.1#top|talk to me]]</sup> 14:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/81.106.187.1|81.106.187.1]]<sup>[[User talk:81.106.187.1#top|talk to me]]</sup> 14:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
:: Can an admin weigh in whether this should be valid? It passes all four rules. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:39, 4 April 2023

Validity[[edit source]]

This seems to break no rules and is in the same style as Farewell, Sarah Jane or Revenge of the Nestene with a narrator being visibly shown.

In fact in the intro to the story Moffat says it’s the shortest Doctor Who story ever so it’s intended to be in the DWU. 81.106.187.1talk to me 14:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Can an admin weigh in whether this should be valid? It passes all four rules. 81.108.82.15talk to me 20:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)