Forum:The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | :Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: I thought they said that it shouldn't be covered on this Wiki? ''That'' is not the same as "it's not set in the DWU"; and even if this is the case, we'd still end up covering it because it's still licensed. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | :: I thought they said that it shouldn't be covered on this Wiki? ''That'' is not the same as "it's not set in the DWU"; and even if this is the case, we'd still end up covering it because it's still licensed. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: ''Also'' Cody's views on the series won't be enough to prevent the series from being covered anyway, given we listen to individual authors; so if an author of a later book in the series did intend for it to be set in the DWU and it was licensed, we'd cover it. | |||
::: Going by [[User talk:Tangerineduel/Archive 6]], [[Blair Bidmead]] said: "'' I'm not particularly concerned whether the book is included in this wiki or not''". Pretty neutral, admittedly, but it does show that at least Blair doesn't view coverage as a ''bad thing''. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:24, 28 June 2023
Index → Inclusion debates → The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
This wiki currently does not cover The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105, despite being a spinoff of Iris Wildthyme, because its creator, Cody Schell asked for it not to be covered. However, I've seen at least two users say that they believe this to be because he misunderstood the scope of this wiki. From what I've seen, I think this is the case and that the series should be both covered and valid. I think the ideal thing to do would be to get into contact with Schell and explain to him that this wiki covers things which are only narrowly tied to Doctor Who. Cgl1999 ☎ 07:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Discussion
That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to apparent authorial intent and yet it failed none of T:VS...
07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is Thread:117545 at User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I and also a deleted thread Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. Najawin ☎ 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- I thought they said that it shouldn't be covered on this Wiki? That is not the same as "it's not set in the DWU"; and even if this is the case, we'd still end up covering it because it's still licensed. 08:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also Cody's views on the series won't be enough to prevent the series from being covered anyway, given we listen to individual authors; so if an author of a later book in the series did intend for it to be set in the DWU and it was licensed, we'd cover it.
- Going by User talk:Tangerineduel/Archive 6, Blair Bidmead said: " I'm not particularly concerned whether the book is included in this wiki or not". Pretty neutral, admittedly, but it does show that at least Blair doesn't view coverage as a bad thing. 08:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
